Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

The rising cases of medical malpractice have highlighted urgent issues in patient care and their legal ramifications within the healthcare sector.

Lawsuit background and development

Settlements and verdicts

How to file a lawsuit

Studies reveal that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the US, claiming approximately 251,000 lives annually. This figure surpasses the deaths caused by strokes, accidents, and Alzheimer's disease, accounting for about 9.5% of all deaths each year. (BMJ)

What Is Medical Malpractice?

Medical malpractice is a legal term that describes a situation where a healthcare professional deviates from the standards of their profession, leading to patient harm.

These standards, known as the “Standards of Care,” are the benchmarks set by the medical community. They define what is considered acceptable and appropriate treatment by reasonably prudent healthcare professionals under similar circumstances, and their violation can lead to serious patient harm.

The standards of care encompass a wide range of criteria, including diagnostic procedures, treatment regimens, patient management, and follow-up care.

When a healthcare provider fails to meet these standards through negligence, omission, or improper conduct, and this failure results in patient injury, it forms the basis for a medical malpractice claim.

Common Types and Examples of Malpractice

Depending on the nature and specific circumstances of these cases, there are several different types of medical malpractice.


Misdiagnosis is when a medical professional incorrectly identifies a disease or condition in a patient. This incorrect identification can lead to unsuitable treatment plans or no treatment at all, potentially worsening the patient’s actual condition.

Misdiagnosis can occur due to overlapping symptoms among different diseases, limited patient history, or insufficient diagnostic testing.

For instance, diagnosing multiple sclerosis when a patient actually has a vitamin B12 deficiency can lead to unnecessary and harmful treatment with disease-modifying drugs while ignoring the real need for nutritional supplementation.

Delayed Diagnosis

Delayed diagnosis refers to the late identification of a condition, which can result in a missed opportunity for early treatment. This type of error can often lead to more complicated or emergency situations that could have been avoided with a timely diagnosis.

Delayed diagnosis is particularly critical in conditions such as cancer or heart disease, where early treatment significantly affects outcomes.

For instance, if a patient with breast cancer is diagnosed only after the cancer has metastasized, the treatment options and prognosis become much more limited compared to early-stage detection.

Surgical Errors

Surgical errors are mistakes made during the operation that can have serious consequences for the patient. These include operating on the wrong part of the body, performing the wrong procedure, or leaving instruments inside the patient.

Such errors are often the result of miscommunication, surgical planning errors, or failure to follow protocols.

A common example of a surgical error is performing an amputation of the wrong limb, leading the patient to the loss of both limbs eventually.

Hospital-Acquired Infections

Infections in a medical setting, specifically those acquired in hospitals, are known as hospital-acquired infections (HAIs).

These infections can arise following surgeries, from the use of medical devices like catheters, or through other invasive procedures. HAIs are often related to breaches in sterile techniques, improper or prolonged use of medical devices, and insufficient post-procedural care.

Common examples include patients developing MRSA after joint replacement surgery or contracting pseudomonas during ICU stays through ventilators.

Failure to Treat

Failure to treat is a situation when a healthcare provider makes an accurate diagnosis but fails to recommend or administer an appropriate treatment regimen. This can occur due to a variety of reasons, including misjudging the severity of the condition or administrative oversights.

Failure to treat can lead to worsening of the patient's condition and other avoidable complications.

For instance, a diabetic patient not being prescribed insulin or guided on lifestyle changes can lead to severe complications like diabetic ketoacidosis or even coma.

Obstetric or Birth Injuries

Birth injuries, also known as obstetric injuries, are incidents in which harm occurs to the baby or mother during childbirth due to medical negligence.

Common causes for such injuries include improper use of birthing tools, failure to respond to signs of fetal distress, or inadequate monitoring during labor.

Obstetric injuries can result in conditions such as brachial plexus injuries from forceful extraction or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy due to delayed cesarean sections.

Medication Errors

Another common type of medical malpractice involves medication errors, where there is a failure in the prescribing, dispensing, or administering of medications.

Errors could include giving a patient a drug they are allergic to, incorrect dosing, or drug interactions that cause adverse effects.

For example, an elderly patient might be given a dose of medication that is too high for their body weight, leading to overdose symptoms such as confusion, fainting, or respiratory depression.

Anesthesia Errors

Anesthesia errors are mistakes related to the use of anesthesia during medical procedures. These errors can include administering too much or too little anesthesia, using the wrong anesthetic agent, or failing to monitor the patient’s vital signs.

The consequences of anesthesia errors can be grave, including permanent injury or, in worst-case scenarios, death.

A specific instance is a patient experiencing awareness during surgery due to insufficient anesthesia, leading to trauma and potentially long-term psychological effects.

The Legal Implications of Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice incidents can profoundly impact healthcare providers, resulting in lawsuits, increased insurance costs, reputational damage, and potential license loss. The serious nature of these repercussions makes it essential that claims of malpractice are thoroughly substantiated to maintain fairness and integrity in the healthcare system.

Eligibility Criteria for Medical Malpractice Claims

Before anyone can claim medical malpractice, they must establish that the healthcare provider violated specific legal standards. This process begins with the "four Ds" of medical negligence, which serve as the bedrock for determining the validity of a claim:

  • Duty: The claim must demonstrate that the healthcare provider owed a duty of care to the patient, typically confirmed by the doctor-patient relationship.
  • Dereliction (Neglect): There must be conclusive evidence showing that the healthcare provider breached this duty by failing to adhere to the accepted standard of care.
  • Damages: There must be clear proof that the patient suffered harm or injury as a result of this deviation. This includes both physical and psychological impacts.
  • Direct Cause: The injury must be directly linked to the negligence, establishing that the provider’s actions were the direct cause of the harm.

These elements collectively ensure that only meritorious claims proceed, safeguarding the legal process against frivolous lawsuits while protecting the rights of both patients and healthcare providers. Understanding and proving each of these criteria are fundamental for advancing a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Liability in Medical Malpractice Cases

In medical malpractice cases, determining liability is a complex process that involves pinpointing which parties failed to meet the necessary standard of care, directly causing harm to the patient. This scrutiny extends to all entities involved in the delivery of healthcare, including:

  • Healthcare Providers: This broad category includes physicians, nurses, and any other medical practitioners directly involved in patient care. They can be held liable if their actions or failures directly lead to patient harm.
  • Hospitals and Medical Facilities: Often, the institutions themselves bear responsibility for their staff's actions, especially if the incident stemmed from systemic issues like inadequate training, staffing shortages, or poor facility management.
  • Medical Device Manufacturers: If a malfunctioning or inherently flawed medical device causes harm, the manufacturer of that device can be held liable under product liability laws.
  • Pharmaceutical Companies: When drugs cause unexpected harm due to side effects or manufacturing issues, the pharmaceutical companies might be held accountable, particularly if they failed to provide adequate warnings.
  • Contracted Medical Staff: Sometimes, healthcare providers are contracted from a third party. Both the individual provider and the agency that contracted them might be liable if the care provided was substandard.

By identifying all responsible parties, the legal system ensures that all aspects of the care pathway are scrutinized and held to high standards. This comprehensive approach not only brings justice to affected patients but also reinforces the imperative for safety and accountability in healthcare.

Establishing the Health Care Professional's Negligence

In medical malpractice cases, it is up to the plaintiff to provide concrete evidence and establish that the healthcare professional's negligence directly caused the injury. The essential components for demonstrating negligence in medical malpractice lawsuits are:

  • Medical Records: Comprehensive documentation of the patient's medical history, treatments, responses, and outcomes that provide insights into what care was given versus what should have been given.
  • Expert Testimony: Opinions from medical experts who can evaluate the care provided against standard medical practices to determine if there was a deviation that constitutes negligence.
  • Witness Statements: Testimonies from other healthcare professionals, staff members, or anyone who witnessed the care provided can support claims of negligence or contradict the defense's narrative.
  • Photographic and Video Evidence: Visual documentation of the patient's condition before and after the treatment can be powerful in demonstrating the impact of the alleged negligence.
  • Forensic Evidence: In some cases, forensic analysis may be necessary to reconstruct incidents or clarify details of the treatment that led to injury, especially in complex cases involving surgery or specialized treatments.

Collecting and effectively presenting this evidence is crucial for substantiating claims of negligence, thereby providing a solid foundation for the legal arguments in a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Notable Cases and Legal Precedents

In addition to identifying liability, establishing causation, and proving negligence, legal precedents also play a major role in shaping the landscape of medical malpractice law. These precedents guide courts by providing established examples of how similar cases have been adjudicated, helping to ensure consistency and predictability in legal outcomes.

Here are some of the most notable medical malpractice cases, widely known for their dramatic impacts on legal and medical standards:

  • Jesica Santillan Case:

Jesica Santillan was a 17-year-old Mexican national who underwent a heart and lung transplant operation at Duke University Medical Center in 2003.

Due to a misunderstanding between her surgeon, Dr. Jim Jaggers, and the organ transplant coordinating agency, Jesica received organs from a donor with a different blood type. This led to severe brain damage and ultimately, her death.

Nearly a year and a half after Jesica Santillan’s death, Duke University Health System agreed to pay an undisclosed sum of money to her family. The terms of the settlement are to be kept confidential under court order.

(DukeHealth, DukeMagazine)

  • Rhode Island Hospital Wrong Site Surgeries:

Rhode Island Hospital faced significant scrutiny in 2007, after performing brain surgeries on the wrong side of patients’ heads in three separate instances, in one year. Two of the mistakes were caught early enough to treat the correct side, but the other surgery resulted in the death of an 86-year-old patient.

These incidents led to the Rhode Island Department of Health fining the hospital $50,000, and the hospital was also reprimanded for this continuing pattern.

The state ordered the hospital to take a series of steps to ensure such a mistake would not happen again, including an independent review of its neurosurgery practices and better verification from doctors of surgery plans.


  • Benjamin Houghton Case:

Benjamin Houghton, an Air Force veteran, underwent treatment for possible cancer of one testicle at West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. However, after a series of unfortunate missteps, surgeons mistakenly removed the healthy testicle instead.

Houghton and his wife Monica decided to bring a claim against the Los Angeles VA Medical Center. The claim sought $200,000 for future care and unspecified damages. The case was won, but the exact settlement amount is not disclosed.


  • Anuj Thapa Case:

Anuj Thapa, a 17-year-old student from Nepal, was injured while playing indoor soccer and underwent surgery at St. Cloud Hospital.

Post-surgery, Anuj experienced severe pain and, despite voicing his concerns, was discharged. He returned six days later, where he was diagnosed with acute compartment syndrome. This led to 20 additional surgeries and permanent damage.

Thapa was initially awarded $111.3 million for pain and suffering, which was the largest malpractice verdict in Minnesota's history. However, a federal judge later reduced this award to $10 million, deeming the original amount "shockingly excessive."


  • Kathleen Kromphardt Case:

Kathleen Kromphardt and her son sustained serious brain damage during his birth, leading to a lawsuit against an Iowa City hospital. The family alleged that the damage was caused due to negligence in the hours leading up to the birth.

A Johnson County jury initially awarded more than $97.4 million, which was the largest medical malpractice judgment in Iowa's history, later reduced to $75.6 million.

Controversially, court filings suggest that the hospital’s insurance company refused to settle within policy limits, allegedly to influence tort-reform legislation by demonstrating the need for damage caps in malpractice cases.


All of the above cases illustrate the severe consequences and systemic changes prompted by medical errors, demonstrating the critical importance of diligence and accountability in healthcare settings.

Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim

Filing a medical malpractice claim involves a rigorous process of proving negligence on the part of healthcare providers. Victims must not only demonstrate that medical standards were not met, but also navigate a labyrinth of legal procedures to claim compensation.

Your Legal Options After Medical Malpractice

In the aftermath of medical malpractice, it is important to understand the legal pathways available for securing justice and compensation. Let's explore the various options you might consider in the wake of a medical malpractice incident.

  • Individual Lawsuits: This is the most common approach where the injured party files a claim against healthcare providers, hospitals, or both, depending on where the negligence occurred.
  • Multi-District Litigation (MDL): In cases where multiple patients are harmed in a similar manner by the same entity, their cases may be consolidated in one federal district court for pre-trial proceedings. This helps manage many similar cases more efficiently while preserving the individual details of each case.
  • Class Action Lawsuits: If a group of patients is harmed in the same way by the same action or product, they might file a class action lawsuit, which allows one or several people to sue on behalf of a larger group.
  • Settlements: Many medical malpractice claims are settled out of court. Settlements can provide compensation without the uncertainty of a trial but require skilled negotiation to ensure fair compensation.
  • Arbitration and Mediation: Some healthcare contracts require disputes to be resolved through arbitration. This can be quicker than traditional court cases but might limit the amount of damages that can be recovered.

Each legal route, whether it involves individual lawsuits, class actions, or settlements, comes with its own set of procedures, advantages, and limitations. Navigating these complexities requires a clear and informed legal strategy, which is why professional legal counsel is critical.

A skilled medical malpractice lawyer can provide invaluable guidance, helping to determine the most effective pathway for your specific case and ensuring that your rights are fully protected throughout the process.

The Importance of Hiring a Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Medical malpractice claims are among the most complex legal undertakings due to the intricate nature of medical evidence and the need to prove causation and breach of duty. Some of the challenges related to claiming medical malpractice include:

  • Navigating Complex Legal and Medical Issues: Medical malpractice cases often involve understanding complex medical procedures and terminology. Lawyers with expertise in this field are equipped to handle the nuances of both the legal and healthcare systems.
  • Dealing with Insurance Companies: Experienced attorneys can effectively negotiate with insurance companies that may be more interested in protecting their financial interests than offering fair settlements.
  • Access to Medical Experts: Successful medical malpractice claims often depend on testimony from medical experts. Lawyers have the necessary resources to identify and hire reputable experts who can validate the claim of malpractice.
  • Maximizing Compensation: An experienced lawyer can accurately assess the full extent of damages, including future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering, to ensure that the compensation claimed reflects the harm suffered.
  • Legal Strategy and Litigation: An attorney can help decide whether to settle or proceed to trial, manage the litigation process, file motions, and argue the case in court, if necessary.

Given these complexities, securing an experienced law specialist is crucial when claiming medical malpractice. They not only increase the likelihood of a successful outcome but also ensure that the process is handled professionally and thoroughly, allowing the victims to focus on recovery and rehabilitation.

Compensation and Settlements

The financial aspects of a medical malpractice claim can be as complex as the legal challenges. Compensation and settlements in these cases are not only about rectifying a wrong but also providing financial support to cover both present and future repercussions of the malpractice.

How Much Are Most Medical Malpractice Settlements?

Medical malpractice settlements vary greatly, and there is no standard "go-to" amount. The value of a settlement can depend on multiple factors, including the severity of the injury, the extent of negligence, the patient's age and health prior to the incident, the economic losses incurred, and the costs for future care needed.

Other considerations might include the pain and suffering experienced and the jurisdiction's attitude towards malpractice claims. Each case is unique, and the settlement reflects the specific circumstances and damages involved.

Legal precedents can also influence the amount of medical malpractice settlements, especially in cases where they help establish the extent of damages or define the standards of care in specific scenarios. However, their impact is often indirect and varies by jurisdiction, reflecting previous court decisions on similar cases within the area.

Compensation for Medical Malpractice

As we previously mentioned, the compensation awarded to medical malpractice victims is intended not just to address financial losses but also to acknowledge the broader impacts of the harm suffered. Here’s how these damages are categorized and what they typically cover:

Economic Damages

Economic damages encompass the tangible financial losses incurred by the victim as a direct result of the medical malpractice. These may include:

  • Medical Expenses: Covering both past and future medical costs associated with treating the injuries caused by malpractice. This includes hospital bills, doctor's fees, medication expenses, rehabilitation costs, and any necessary medical equipment.
  • Lost Wages: Compensation for income lost due to the inability to work during recovery from injuries caused by medical malpractice.
  • Loss of Earning Capacity: If the victim's ability to earn income in the future is diminished as a result of the malpractice, they may be entitled to compensation for the reduced earning potential.

For instance, if a surgical error leads to prolonged recovery or disability, the patient may claim these economic damages to cover their medical expenses, lost wages, and future earning potential.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages are intended to compensate the victim for intangible losses that do not have a direct monetary value but significantly impact their quality of life, such as:

  • Pain and Suffering: Compensation for physical pain, discomfort, and emotional distress endured as a result of the malpractice.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensation for the loss of ability to participate in activities and hobbies that the victim enjoyed prior to the malpractice.
  • Emotional Distress: Compensation for psychological trauma, anxiety, depression, and other emotional anguish caused by the malpractice. This includes the mental and emotional strain resulting from the trauma of the medical error, as well as the fear and uncertainty about future health outcomes.

For instance, if a misdiagnosis leads to severe anxiety or depression, the victim may be entitled to compensation for the emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life they experience as a result.

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are awarded in exceptional cases of egregious misconduct or recklessness on the part of the defendant. Unlike economic and non-economic damages, which are intended to compensate the victim for their losses, punitive damages serve a different purpose:

  • Deterrence: Punitive damages are designed to punish the wrongdoer for their misconduct and deter similar conduct in the future. By imposing financial penalties beyond compensatory damages, the court aims to send a message that such behavior will not be tolerated.
  • Accountability: Punitive damages hold the defendant accountable for their actions and send a signal that the justice system takes medical malpractice seriously. They are reserved for cases where the defendant's conduct is deemed particularly reprehensible or egregious.

While less common, punitive damages may be awarded if the defendant's actions demonstrate a blatant disregard for the safety and well-being of the patient, such as cases involving gross negligence or malicious intent.

Are There Limits on Medical Malpractice Awards?

While victims of medical malpractice may seek various types of compensation for their losses, it's essential to be aware of the legal framework that governs these awards.

In many states, caps on medical malpractice awards, particularly on non-economic damages, have been established to address concerns about rising insurance premiums for healthcare providers. These caps vary significantly from state to state, reflecting the diverse approaches taken to regulate medical malpractice claims.

For example, California imposes a cap of $250,000 on non-economic damages, while Texas limits non-economic damages to $250,000 per provider, with a total cap of $500,000. However, the landscape of medical malpractice laws is not uniform across all states. In states like Illinois and Pennsylvania, courts have struck down caps on damages as unconstitutional, leaving plaintiffs with potentially higher compensation. (AMA)

Legal Limitations and Consideration

As if seeking compensation for medical malpractice wasn’t complex and challenging enough, there are additional legal complexities that can arise throughout the process. Here are some key limitations and considerations to be aware of:

Statute of Limitations for a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Each state has a specific time limit, known as the statute of limitations, within which a medical malpractice lawsuit must be filed.

On average, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in the US falls between one and three years from the date the malpractice occurred or the date the patient discovered the injury.

For example, states like Kentucky, Louisiana, and Ohio have a statute of limitations as low as one year, while Minnesota has a four-year statute of limitations on medical malpractice lawsuits.


Contingency Fee Caps

Contingency fees are a common payment structure in medical malpractice cases, where the lawyer's fee is a percentage of the final settlement or award.

A total of 16 US states have regulated contingency fees for medical malpractice cases. Most of them employ a sliding scale fee structure based on the percentage of the amount recovered, while some cap fees at flat rates.

California is a good example of the sliding scale fee structure, capping contingency fees as follows:

  • 40% of the first $50,000 recovered,
  • 33% of the next $50,000,
  • 25% of the next $500,000,
  • 15% of any amount that exceeds $600,000.

Some of the states with fixed contingency fee caps include Utah and Michigan, where fees cannot exceed a third of the net settlement.


Limiting Collateral Source Rule

This rule is a legal doctrine that ensures that damages awarded in personal injury lawsuits are not reduced by amounts that plaintiffs receive from other sources, such as health insurance.

As with everything else, the laws regarding the collateral source rule vary by state, and depending on where you are located, you may face different implications on your compensation recovery.

For example, California has a modified version of the collateral source rule. In California, if insurance or another source has paid for medical expenses, the amount that can be claimed against the defendant may be reduced to reflect only the actual amounts paid, not the higher amounts that might have been billed.

This approach aims to prevent plaintiffs from receiving a "double recovery" where they get compensated more than the actual loss.

On the other hand, New York adheres more closely to the traditional collateral source rule. In New York, defendants cannot reduce the damages they owe by the amount of compensation the plaintiff has received from other sources such as insurance.

This means in New York, the award in a lawsuit is not offset by what insurance or other benefits have already covered, potentially allowing a plaintiff to receive compensation that covers the full extent of the billed services, regardless of what was actually paid out by insurance.


Patient Rights and Protective Measures

Patients have specific rights designed to protect their health and ensure fair treatment and established measures that protect them from medical malpractice, ensuring they receive competent medical care.

To further support these rights, various online resources are available to help patients verify a doctor's credentials and history, providing transparency and additional security in their healthcare interactions.

How to Check a Doctor for Medical Malpractice

To verify a doctor's history concerning medical malpractice, you can use several online resources:

  • Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB): Provides details on a doctor’s medical school, board certification, and any actions against them.
  • State Medical Board's Website: Each state’s medical board maintains records of disciplinary actions and licenses. You can find links to each state's medical board through the FSMB.

How Do I Find Out if a Doctor Has Complaints?

To check if a doctor has complaints against them, consider the following resources:

  • Doctor’s Healthgrades Profile: Patient reviews often include complaints about care and service, which can be a useful indicator of a doctor's general practice.
  • State Medical Board: Offers official records of complaints and actions taken against doctors. Visit your state’s medical board website accessible via the FSMB.

These platforms can be vital in helping you choose a healthcare provider who best meets your needs and maintains a record of professional and ethical medical practice.


Yes, you can file a malpractice claim for errors in anesthesia and medication if these errors result from negligence, leading to injury or harm. These claims can address incorrect drug administration, dosage mistakes, or failure to recognize complications.

A medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed by anyone who has suffered harm due to a medical professional's negligence. This includes patients or, in certain cases, family members acting on behalf of the patient, including minors or incapacitated adults.

If death results from medical malpractice, the deceased’s family or representatives of the estate may file a wrongful death lawsuit. This type of suit seeks compensation for lost wages, funeral expenses, and loss of companionship.

Explore your legal options

Submit your inquiry through our contact form to start your search for legal assistance. Our directory connects you with experienced lawyers in a variety of practice areas, ensuring you have access to advice when you need it most.

  1. Nationwide database
  2. Experienced professionals