An intervening cause is an event that occurs after the initial act that leads to a legal dispute and contributes to or exacerbates the resulting harm. This cause can potentially absolve or reduce the liability of the original actor if it is deemed to break the causal chain between the initial act and the final injury or damage.
An intervening cause, also known as a superseding cause, comes into play after the defendant's initial act and significantly alters the outcome. For it to affect liability, the intervening cause must be unforeseeable and sufficient to break the direct link between the defendant's act and the plaintiff's injury.
Key Characteristics of an Intervening Cause:
Subsequent Event: Occurs after the defendant's initial act.
Impact on Outcome: Contributes to or changes the course of events leading to harm.
Unforeseeability: Must be an unforeseeable event to qualify as an intervening cause.
Effect on Liability: Can absolve or mitigate the defendant's liability if it breaks the causal chain.
Examples:
- A car accident caused by a driver running a red light, followed by another car crashing into the accident scene due to a sudden medical emergency of the second driver.
- A defective product causing minor injury, followed by severe injury when the product is improperly repaired by a third party.
United States: In the United States, the concept of an intervening cause is pivotal in tort law, particularly in negligence cases. Courts assess whether the intervening event was foreseeable and if it sufficiently broke the causal chain between the defendant's act and the plaintiff's injury. If deemed a superseding cause, it can relieve the defendant of liability. However, if the event was foreseeable, the original actor may still be held liable.
United Kingdom: In UK law, intervening causes are addressed under the doctrine of novus actus interveniens. This principle holds that if a new, independent act breaks the chain of causation, the original defendant may be relieved of liability. Courts examine the foreseeability and nature of the intervening act to determine its impact on the causal chain.
Australia: Australian courts also recognize the concept of intervening causes in negligence cases. The courts evaluate whether the intervening event was foreseeable and whether it constituted a significant break in the causal connection between the defendant's act and the resulting harm. An unforeseeable and substantial intervening event can absolve the original actor from liability.
A common misconception is that any event occurring after the initial act automatically qualifies as an intervening cause. In reality, for an event to be considered an intervening cause, it must be unforeseeable and sufficiently impactful to break the causal link between the defendant's action and the harm caused.
Another misconception is that the presence of an intervening cause always absolves the original actor of liability. This is not always the case. If the intervening event was foreseeable or not sufficiently independent to break the causal chain, the original actor may still be held liable.
There is also a misconception that foreseeable events can be considered intervening causes. For an intervening cause to relieve liability, it must be unforeseeable. Foreseeable events are typically accounted for within the scope of the original actor's responsibility.
Contracts and Agreements Lawyer Serving at Birmingham - Michigan
1895 Bradford Rd, Michigan, 48009-72530 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Birmingham - Michigan
1895 Bradford Rd, Michigan, 48009-7253Contracts and Agreements Lawyer Serving at Brighton - Michigan
224 N 1st St, Michigan, 48116-12050 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Brighton - Michigan
224 N 1st St, Michigan, 48116-1205Business Lawyer Serving at Dearborn - Michigan
23756 Michigan Ave Ste 300, Michigan, 48124-18530 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Dearborn - Michigan
23756 Michigan Ave Ste 300, Michigan, 48124-1853Civil Rights Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
1675 Green Rd, Michigan, 48105-25300 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
1675 Green Rd, Michigan, 48105-2530Commercial Lawyer Serving at Farmington Hills - Michigan
31440 Northwestern Hwy Ste 145, Michigan, 48334-54200 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Farmington Hills - Michigan
31440 Northwestern Hwy Ste 145, Michigan, 48334-5420Business Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
789 N Dixboro Rd, Michigan, 48105-97230 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
789 N Dixboro Rd, Michigan, 48105-9723Juvenile Lawyer Serving at Hamtramck - Michigan
2933 Caniff St Unit 12250, Michigan, 48212-47120 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Hamtramck - Michigan
2933 Caniff St Unit 12250, Michigan, 48212-4712Workers Compensation Law Lawyer Serving at Los Angeles - California
Law Office of Damir Junicic, 10880 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1101, California, 90024-41120 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Los Angeles - California
Law Office of Damir Junicic, 10880 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1101, California, 90024-4112Environmental and Natural Resources Lawyer Serving at Detroit - Michigan
651 E Jefferson Ave, Michigan, 48226-43490 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Detroit - Michigan
651 E Jefferson Ave, Michigan, 48226-4349Business Lawyer Serving at Mount Pleasant - Michigan
164 Grawn Hall, Michigan, 48859-00010 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Mount Pleasant - Michigan
164 Grawn Hall, Michigan, 48859-0001