An incidental beneficiary is a person or entity that benefits from a contract between two other parties but is not intended by the contracting parties to have enforceable rights under the contract. Unlike intended beneficiaries, incidental beneficiaries do not have legal standing to enforce the terms of the contract.
Incidental beneficiaries gain some advantage from the performance of a contract but were not the primary focus of the parties' agreement. The benefit received is secondary and unintentional, meaning the parties to the contract did not specifically aim to benefit the incidental beneficiary.
Key Characteristics of an Incidental Beneficiary:
Secondary Benefit: Gains a benefit from the contract as a byproduct, not as a direct intention.
No Enforceable Rights: Cannot enforce the contract terms or sue for breach.
Unintended Advantage: The contracting parties did not intend to confer rights or benefits to the incidental beneficiary.
Third-Party Status: Is not a party to the contract and has no standing in relation to it.
Examples:
- A local restaurant benefits from increased foot traffic due to a nearby construction project agreed upon by a developer and a city, but the restaurant cannot enforce any terms of the construction contract.
- A homeowner benefits from improved road access because of a contract between a municipality and a construction company, but the homeowner cannot enforce the contract terms.
United States: In U.S. contract law, the distinction between intended and incidental beneficiaries is crucial. The Restatement (Second) of Contracts outlines that only intended beneficiaries, who are explicitly meant to benefit from a contract, have the right to enforce it. Incidental beneficiaries, while they may gain some advantage, do not have legal standing to claim any rights under the contract.
United Kingdom: UK contract law follows similar principles, distinguishing between those who are intended to benefit directly from a contract and those who are incidental beneficiaries. Under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, only individuals or entities expressly identified as beneficiaries or meeting certain conditions can enforce contract terms. Incidental beneficiaries do not have such rights.
Australia: In Australia, the concept of privity of contract means that only parties to a contract can enforce its terms. Incidental beneficiaries, who derive benefits indirectly or unintentionally, have no legal standing to enforce the contract. This principle ensures that contractual rights and obligations are confined to the parties who made the agreement.
A common misconception is that incidental beneficiaries have the right to enforce contract terms. In reality, only intended beneficiaries, who are specifically meant to benefit from the contract, have enforceable rights. Incidental beneficiaries, despite benefiting indirectly, cannot sue for breach or enforce the contract.
Another misconception is that any third party benefiting from a contract is an intended beneficiary. This is not true; many beneficiaries are incidental, receiving advantages unintentionally and without any enforceable rights. The key distinction lies in the contracting parties' intent to confer a direct benefit.
There is also a misconception that incidental benefits must be foreseen by the contracting parties. While incidental beneficiaries gain advantages from a contract, these benefits are not necessarily foreseen or considered by the parties. The benefits are incidental and occur as a byproduct of the contract's performance.
Contracts and Agreements Lawyer Serving at Birmingham - Michigan
1895 Bradford Rd, Michigan, 48009-72530 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Birmingham - Michigan
1895 Bradford Rd, Michigan, 48009-7253Contracts and Agreements Lawyer Serving at Brighton - Michigan
224 N 1st St, Michigan, 48116-12050 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Brighton - Michigan
224 N 1st St, Michigan, 48116-1205Business Lawyer Serving at Dearborn - Michigan
23756 Michigan Ave Ste 300, Michigan, 48124-18530 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Dearborn - Michigan
23756 Michigan Ave Ste 300, Michigan, 48124-1853Civil Rights Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
1675 Green Rd, Michigan, 48105-25300 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
1675 Green Rd, Michigan, 48105-2530Commercial Lawyer Serving at Farmington Hills - Michigan
31440 Northwestern Hwy Ste 145, Michigan, 48334-54200 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Farmington Hills - Michigan
31440 Northwestern Hwy Ste 145, Michigan, 48334-5420Business Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
789 N Dixboro Rd, Michigan, 48105-97230 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Ann Arbor - Michigan
789 N Dixboro Rd, Michigan, 48105-9723Juvenile Lawyer Serving at Hamtramck - Michigan
2933 Caniff St Unit 12250, Michigan, 48212-47120 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Hamtramck - Michigan
2933 Caniff St Unit 12250, Michigan, 48212-4712Workers Compensation Law Lawyer Serving at Los Angeles - California
Law Office of Damir Junicic, 10880 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1101, California, 90024-41120 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Los Angeles - California
Law Office of Damir Junicic, 10880 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1101, California, 90024-4112Environmental and Natural Resources Lawyer Serving at Detroit - Michigan
651 E Jefferson Ave, Michigan, 48226-43490 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Detroit - Michigan
651 E Jefferson Ave, Michigan, 48226-4349Business Lawyer Serving at Mount Pleasant - Michigan
164 Grawn Hall, Michigan, 48859-00010 reviews
Lawyer Serving at Mount Pleasant - Michigan
164 Grawn Hall, Michigan, 48859-0001